All Relations between planning and tps

Publication Sentence Publish Date Extraction Date Species
Hironao Goto, Hirokazu Mizuno, Yuichi Akino, Masaru Isono, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Norihisa Masai, Toshijiro Yamamoto, Masahiko Koizum. Evaluation of the Differences Between Measurements in Multiple Institutions and Calculation Modeled by Representative Beam Data in Prostate VMAT Plan. In vivo (Athens, Greece). vol 34. issue 3. 2021-02-10. PMID:32354954. this study aimed to investigate the potential differences between multi-institutional measurements and treatment planning system (tps) calculation modeled by representative beam data for patient-specific quality assurance (qa), including multi-leaf collimator (mlc) parameters. 2021-02-10 2023-08-13 Not clear
Elizabeth L Covington, Richard A Popple, Rex A Carda. Technical Note: Use of automation to eliminate shift errors. Journal of applied clinical medical physics. vol 21. issue 3. 2021-02-02. PMID:32039543. to create automated tools within the treatment planning system (tps) that eliminate the common error pathway of providing incorrect shift instructions to therapists. 2021-02-02 2023-08-13 Not clear
Anando Sen, Brian M Anderson, Guillaume Cazoulat, Molly M McCulloch, Dalia Elganainy, Brigid A McDonald, Yulun He, Abdallah S R Mohamed, Baher A Elgohari, Mohamed Zaid, Eugene J Koay, Kristy K Broc. Accuracy of deformable image registration techniques for alignment of longitudinal cholangiocarcinoma CT images. Medical physics. vol 47. issue 4. 2021-01-26. PMID:31958147. in this study, the accuracy of five commercially available dir algorithms in four treatment planning systems (tps) was investigated for the registration of planning images with posttreatment follow-up images for response assessment or re-treatment purposes. 2021-01-26 2023-08-13 Not clear
Akbar Anvari, Arezoo Modiri, Ravina Pandita, Javed Mahmood, Amit Sawan. Online dose delivery verification in small animal image-guided radiotherapy. Medical physics. vol 47. issue 4. 2021-01-26. PMID:32022928. although such systems have sophisticated tools (such as cone-beam computed tomography-based image guidance, robotic couch, treatment planning system (tps), and electronic portal imaging devices [epids]). 2021-01-26 2023-08-13 rat
Courtney Bosse, Ganesh Narayanasamy, Daniel Saenz, Pamela Myers, Neil Kirby, Karl Rasmussen, Panayiotis Mavroidis, Niko Papanikolaou, Sotirios Stathaki. Dose Calculation Comparisons between Three Modern Treatment Planning Systems. Journal of medical physics. vol 45. issue 3. 2021-01-26. PMID:33487926. monaco treatment planning system (tps) version 5.1 uses a monte-carlo (mc)-based dose calculation engine. 2021-01-26 2023-08-13 Not clear
Changdong Ma, Jinghao Duan, Shuang Yu, Changsheng M. Dosimetric study of three-dimensional static and dynamic SBRT radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma based on 4DCT image deformable registration. Journal of applied clinical medical physics. vol 21. issue 2. 2021-01-20. PMID:31889422. data were acquired from the tracking of each phase with the beam aperture for 28 hepatocellular carcinoma patients, and the data were used to generate a cumulative plan, which was compared to a three-dimensional (3d) plan formed from a merged target volume based on 4dct images in a radiation treatment planning system (tps). 2021-01-20 2023-08-13 Not clear
Brandon Koger, Ryan Price, Da Wang, Dolla Toomeh, Sarah Geneser, Eric For. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures. Journal of applied clinical medical physics. vol 21. issue 2. 2021-01-20. PMID:31961036. treatment planning system (tps) dose calculation is sensitive to multileaf collimator (mlc) modeling, especially when treating with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (imrt) or vmat. 2021-01-20 2023-08-13 Not clear
Takahiro Kanehira, Stina Svensson, Simon van Kranen, Jan-Jakob Sonk. Accurate estimation of daily delivered radiotherapy dose with an external treatment planning system. Physics and imaging in radiation oncology. vol 14. 2021-01-19. PMID:33458312. accurate estimation of the daily radiotherapy dose is challenging in a multi-institutional collaboration when the institution specific treatment planning system (tps) is not available. 2021-01-19 2023-08-13 Not clear
Clara Le Fèvre, David Brinkert, Inès Menoux, Florent Kuntz, Delphine Antoni, Ziad El Bitar, Alicia Thiery, Robin Fabbro, Georges Noë. Effects of a metallic implant on radiotherapy planning treatment-experience on a human cadaver. Chinese clinical oncology. vol 9. issue 2. 2021-01-04. PMID:32075394. in this work, we evaluate the impact of human tissue inhomogeneities by assessing the discrepancies between treatment planning system (tps) dose calculations and measured delivered doses on a human cadaver with hip prostheses. 2021-01-04 2023-08-13 human
Eun Young Han, Manik Aima, Neil Hughes, Tina M Briere, Debra N Yeboa, Pam Castillo, Jihong Wang, Jinzhong Yang, Sastry Veda. Feasibility of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy in Elekta Unity Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT. vol 7. issue 2. 2021-01-01. PMID:33282466. our study indicated that the monaco treatment planning system (tps) could generate clinical treatment plans for the mrl that were of comparable quality to the raystation tps with a conventional linac. 2021-01-01 2023-08-13 Not clear
Kohei Kawata, Takeshi Kamomae, Hiroshi Oguchi, Fumitaka Kawabata, Kuniyasu Okudaira, Mariko Kawamura, Kazuhiro Ohtakara, Yoshiyuki Itoh, Shinji Naganaw. Evaluation of newly implemented dose calculation algorithms for multileaf collimator-based CyberKnife tumor-tracking radiotherapy. Medical physics. vol 47. issue 3. 2020-12-29. PMID:31913508. in the previous treatment planning system (tps) for cyberknife (ck), multileaf collimator (mlc)-based treatment plans could be created only by using the finite-size pencil beam (fspb) algorithm. 2020-12-29 2023-08-13 Not clear
Stephen F Kry, Vladimir Feygelman, Peter Balter, Tommy Knöös, C-M Charlie Ma, Michael Snyder, Brian Tonner, Oleg N Vassilie. AAPM Task Group 329: Reference dose specification for dose calculations: Dose-to-water or dose-to-muscle? Medical physics. vol 47. issue 3. 2020-12-28. PMID:31883390. however, many current treatment planning system (tps) dose calculation algorithms approximately provide dose-to-muscle (tissue), making application of a manual scaling unnecessary. 2020-12-28 2023-08-13 Not clear
G Guterres Marmitt, A Pin, K Ng Wei Siang, G Janssens, K Souris, M Cohilis, J A Langendijk, S Both, A Knopf, A Meijer. Platform for automatic patient quality assurance via Monte Carlo simulations in proton therapy. Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB). vol 70. 2020-12-17. PMID:31968277. errors in the dose calculations done in the treatment planning system (tps), treatment delivery errors, other software bugs or data corruption during transfer might lead to significant differences between predicted and delivered doses. 2020-12-17 2023-08-13 Not clear
Young Kyung Lee, Iram Munawar, Shahram Mashouf, Arjun Sahgal, Mark Ruschi. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT. Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. vol 45. issue 1. 2020-12-07. PMID:31376988. two commonly used treatment planning systems (tps) are compared for the planning of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (sbrt). 2020-12-07 2023-08-13 Not clear
Temiloluwa O Esho, Christine V Chung, Juanita U Thompson, Mahsa Dehghanpour, Jordan R Sutton, Simona F Shaitelman, Kelly K Kisling, Laurence E Cour. Optimization of autogenerated chest-wall radiation treatment plans developed for postmastectomy breast cancer patients in underserved clinics. Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. vol 45. issue 1. 2020-12-07. PMID:31956001. in an effort to reduce inequities in cancer care while improving patient outcomes, our research is focused on developing automated postmastectomy radiation therapy (pmrt) plans for breast cancer patients in these underserved communities that can be further improved upon through treatment planning system (tps) specific optimization guidelines. 2020-12-07 2023-08-13 Not clear
Temiloluwa O Esho, Christine V Chung, Juanita U Thompson, Mahsa Dehghanpour, Jordan R Sutton, Simona F Shaitelman, Kelly K Kisling, Laurence E Cour. Optimization of autogenerated chest-wall radiation treatment plans developed for postmastectomy breast cancer patients in underserved clinics. Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. vol 45. issue 1. 2020-12-07. PMID:31956001. the automated planning tool utilized algorithms integrated with varian's eclipse tps. 2020-12-07 2023-08-13 Not clear
Sheng-Fang Huang, Jang-Chun Lin, An-Cheng Shiau, Yun-Chih Chen, Ming-Hsien Li, Jo-Ting Tsai, Wei-Hsiu Li. Optimal tumor coverage with different beam energies by IMRT, VMAT and TOMO: Effects on patients with proximal gastric cancer. Medicine. vol 99. issue 47. 2020-12-07. PMID:33217871. the pinnacle treatment planning system (tps, v9.8) was used to generate imrt and vmat plans by using 6 or 10 mv. 2020-12-07 2023-08-13 Not clear
Sina Mossahebi, Pouya Sabouri, Haijian Chen, Michelle Mundis, Matthew O'Neil, Paul Maggi, Jerimy C Pol. Initial Validation of Proton Dose Calculations on SPR Images from DECT in Treatment Planning System. International journal of particle therapy. vol 7. issue 2. 2020-12-07. PMID:33274257. to investigate and quantify the potential benefits associated with the use of stopping-power-ratio (spr) images created from dual-energy computed tomography (dect) images for proton dose calculation in a clinical proton treatment planning system (tps). 2020-12-07 2023-08-13 Not clear
Marie Cohilis, Edmond Sterpin, John A Lee, Kevin Souri. A noise correction of the γ-index method for Monte Carlo dose distribution comparison. Medical physics. vol 47. issue 2. 2020-11-23. PMID:31660623. in this context, monte carlo (mc) simulations are more and more often used to verify the accuracy of the treatment planning system (tps). 2020-11-23 2023-08-13 Not clear
Yiwei Yang, Kainan Shao, Jie Zhang, Ming Chen, Yuanyuan Chen, Guoping Sha. Automatic Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Progressive Optimization in RayStation Treatment Planning System. Technology in cancer research & treatment. vol 19. 2020-11-20. PMID:32552600. to evaluate and quantify the planning performance of automatic planning (ap) with manual planning (mp) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the raystation treatment planning system (tps). 2020-11-20 2023-08-13 Not clear