| Publication |
Sentence |
Publish Date |
Extraction Date |
Species |
| W G Graziano, H M Bryan. Self-monitoring and the self-attribution of positive emotions. Journal of personality and social psychology. vol 74. issue 1. 1998-03-23. PMID:9457786. |
this analysis of self-monitoring (sm) focuses on emotional self-regulation. |
1998-03-23 |
2023-08-12 |
Not clear |
| S Shimizu, N Ito, M Fujiwara, K Takanashi, S Weerakoon, E B Deshapriy. [Is TLFB method applicable to Japanese drinking population?: a methodological study on measurement of alcohol consumption]. Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai zasshi = Japanese journal of alcohol studies & drug dependence. vol 32. issue 3. 1997-09-19. PMID:9251524. |
this study tries to explore the comparative, methodological possibilities of timeline follow back (tlfb) as well as self-monitoring (sm) methods to measure drinking quantity, using the sample of japanese and sri lankans. |
1997-09-19 |
2023-08-12 |
Not clear |
| O P John, J M Cheek, E C Klohne. On the nature of self-monitoring: construct explication with Q-sort ratings. Journal of personality and social psychology. vol 71. issue 4. 1996-12-30. PMID:8888602. |
to explicate m. snyder's (1987) construct of self-monitoring (sm), a new q-sort prototype is introduced. |
1996-12-30 |
2023-08-12 |
Not clear |
| M H Anshel, M B Marti. Effect of divergent self-monitoring strategies on motor performance and emotion as a function of alternating task complexity. Journal of sports sciences. vol 14. issue 3. 1996-12-04. PMID:8809715. |
the aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of implementing different self-monitoring (sm) strategies as a function of varying task complexity on a computer game, 'shufflepuck'. |
1996-12-04 |
2023-08-12 |
human |
| M P Nolan. The effects of self-monitoring and reinforcement on exercise adherence. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. vol 60. issue 3. 1991-06-27. PMID:2489846. |
however, the reinforcement group had an 11% improvement in predicted max vo2 and a 9 bpm improvement in exercise heart rate compared to 7.8%, 5 bpm for the self-monitoring (sm) group and 5.3%, 6 bpm for the control group. |
1991-06-27 |
2023-08-11 |
human |
| E H Pecsok, W J Fremou. Controlling laboratory binging among restrained eaters through self-monitoring and cognitive restructuring procedures. Addictive behaviors. vol 13. issue 1. 1988-05-31. PMID:3364222. |
the restrained subjects were randomly assigned to either the restrained control (rc), self-monitoring (sm), or cognitive restructuring (cr) conditions while the 14 unrestrained subjects formed the unrestrained control condition (uc). |
1988-05-31 |
2023-08-11 |
human |