All Relations between motor imagery and rest

Publication Sentence Publish Date Extraction Date Species
Julia B Pitcher, Alexandra L Robertson, Emma C Clover, Shapour Jaberzade. Facilitation of cortically evoked potentials with motor imagery during post-exercise depression of corticospinal excitability. Experimental brain research. vol 160. issue 4. 2005-06-30. PMID:15502993. in experiment 1, motor-evoked potentials (meps) were recorded from two right hand and two right forearm muscles, at rest and during motor imagery of a maximal handgrip contraction, in eight neurologically normal subjects, before and after a 2-min maximal voluntary handgrip contraction. 2005-06-30 2023-08-12 human
Julia B Pitcher, Alexandra L Robertson, Emma C Clover, Shapour Jaberzade. Facilitation of cortically evoked potentials with motor imagery during post-exercise depression of corticospinal excitability. Experimental brain research. vol 160. issue 4. 2005-06-30. PMID:15502993. motor imagery meps were smaller after exercise, but the degree of facilitation compared to the rest mep was unchanged. 2005-06-30 2023-08-12 human
C D Vargas, E Olivier, L Craighero, L Fadiga, J R Duhamel, A Sirig. The influence of hand posture on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). vol 14. issue 11. 2005-01-11. PMID:15142965. for each posture, motor evoked potentials (meps) elicited by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (tms) of the left motor cortex were recorded from the right opponens pollicis muscle during both motor imagery (mi) and rest (r) conditions. 2005-01-11 2023-08-12 human
Angelo Quartarone, Francesca Morgante, Sergio Bagnato, Vincenzo Rizzo, Antonino Sant'Angelo, Elena Aiello, Ester Reggio, Fortunato Battaglia, Corrado Messina, Paolo Girland. Long lasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery. Neuroreport. vol 15. issue 8. 2004-09-16. PMID:15167551. mep amplitudes at rest and during motor imagery were assessed before and for a period of 60 min after transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) applied over the primary motor cortex at 1 ma for 5 min. 2004-09-16 2023-08-12 Not clear
Angelo Quartarone, Francesca Morgante, Sergio Bagnato, Vincenzo Rizzo, Antonino Sant'Angelo, Elena Aiello, Ester Reggio, Fortunato Battaglia, Corrado Messina, Paolo Girland. Long lasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery. Neuroreport. vol 15. issue 8. 2004-09-16. PMID:15167551. ten minutes after tdcs, meps at rest returned to baseline values while meps during motor imagery were suppressed for up to 30 min. 2004-09-16 2023-08-12 Not clear
Sheng Li, Mark L Latash, Vladimir M Zatsiorsk. Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain research. Cognitive brain research. vol 20. issue 2. 2004-08-17. PMID:15183398. three conditions were tested in eight young healthy volunteers: at rest, during motor imagery of maximal force production by the index finger (imin), and during motor imagery of maximal force production by all four fingers simultaneously (imall). 2004-08-17 2023-08-12 human
Sheng Li, Mark L Latash, Vladimir M Zatsiorsk. Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain research. Cognitive brain research. vol 20. issue 2. 2004-08-17. PMID:15183398. tms-induced forces were larger during motor imagery tasks than at rest. 2004-08-17 2023-08-12 human
R Cunnington, G F Egan, J D O'Sullivan, A J Hughes, J L Bradshaw, J G Colebatc. Motor imagery in Parkinson's disease: a PET study. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. vol 16. issue 5. 2002-02-13. PMID:11746614. trials alternating between motor imagery and rest were measured. 2002-02-13 2023-08-12 Not clear
F Tremblay, L E Tremblay, D E Colce. Modulation of corticospinal excitability during imagined knee movements. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. vol 33. issue 5. 2002-01-29. PMID:11585155. the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials were compared in three conditions: (1) at rest, (2) during motor imagery, and (3) at rest, immediately after motor imagery. 2002-01-29 2023-08-12 human
F Tremblay, L E Tremblay, D E Colce. Modulation of corticospinal excitability during imagined knee movements. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. vol 33. issue 5. 2002-01-29. PMID:11585155. during motor imagery, the size of motor evoked potentials in the quadriceps increased significantly (p < 0.001) compared with rest and post-imagery conditions. 2002-01-29 2023-08-12 human
M Samuel, A O Ceballos-Baumann, H Boecker, D J Brook. Motor imagery in normal subjects and Parkinson's disease patients: an H215O PET study. Neuroreport. vol 12. issue 4. 2001-08-02. PMID:11277590. we used positron emission tomography to compare regional cerebral blood flow (rcbf) in patients with parkinson's disease and normal controls under three conditions: rest, motor imagery and motor execution. 2001-08-02 2023-08-12 human