All Relations between Hearing Loss and ci

Publication Sentence Publish Date Extraction Date Species
R D Marx, S T Bae. Spontaneous recovery of profound post-meningitic hearing loss. The Journal of laryngology and otology. vol 115. issue 5. 2001-07-26. PMID:11410137. the timing of insertion of a cochlear implant (ci) in post-meningitic sensorineural hearing loss is, in spite of recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of the condition, still controversial. 2001-07-26 2023-08-12 Not clear
P G Trautwein, Y S Sininger, R Nelso. Cochlear implantation of auditory neuropathy. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. vol 11. issue 6. 2000-10-11. PMID:10858002. all children with hearing loss in the severe-to-profound range who do not benefit from conventional amplification can be considered candidates for a cochlear implant (ci). 2000-10-11 2023-08-12 Not clear
M Manrique, F J Cervera-Paz, A Huarte, N Perez, M Molina, R García-Tapi. Cerebral auditory plasticity and cochlear implants. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. vol 49 Suppl 1. 1999-12-08. PMID:10577804. prelingual children under 6 years of age should receive a ci as soon as there is a reliable diagnosis of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. 1999-12-08 2023-08-12 Not clear
M Manrique, A Ramos, C Morera, M Sainz, J Algaba, F J Cervera-Pa. Spanish study group on cochlear implants for persons with marginal benefit from acoustic amplification. Acta oto-laryngologica. vol 118. issue 5. 1999-02-04. PMID:9840497. recently the u.s. food and drug administration approved the use of cochlear implants (ci) in patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss with marginal benefit (< 30% speech discrimination) from hearing aids (ha). 1999-02-04 2023-08-12 human
M Manrique, A Ramos, C Morera, M Sainz, J Algaba, F J Cervera-Pa. Spanish study group on cochlear implants for persons with marginal benefit from acoustic amplification. Acta oto-laryngologica. vol 118. issue 5. 1999-02-04. PMID:9840497. therefore the ci appears an appropriate treatment for spanish speakers with a severe-to-profound hearing loss and marginal benefits with ha. 1999-02-04 2023-08-12 human
K J Cruickshanks, T L Wiley, T S Tweed, B E Klein, R Klein, J A Mares-Perlman, D M Nondah. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. American journal of epidemiology. vol 148. issue 9. 1998-11-13. PMID:9801018. the odds of hearing loss increased with age (odds ratio (or) = 1.88 for 5 years, 95% confidence interval (ci) 1.80-1.97) and were greater for men than women (or = 4.42, 95% ci 3.73-5.24). 1998-11-13 2023-08-12 human
W E Daniell, D Fulton-Kehoe, T Smith-Weller, G M Frankli. Occupational hearing loss in Washington state, 1984-1991: II. Morbidity and associated costs. American journal of industrial medicine. vol 33. issue 6. 1998-07-20. PMID:9582943. acute hearing-related conditions comprised 11% of accepted conditions (95% confidence interval [ci], 2-15%); most claims were for chronic noise-related hearing loss. 1998-07-20 2023-08-12 Not clear
H P Zenner, H Leysieffe. [Active electronic cochlear implants for middle and inner ear hearing loss--a new era in ear surgery. I: Basic principles and recommendations on nomenclature]. HNO. vol 45. issue 10. 1998-01-27. PMID:9445847. the implant expressions iti (for patients with conductive hearing loss) and cai (for patients with sensorineural hearing loss) used in this context allow nomenclatural association with the ci (cochlear implant) for complete inner ear failure as well as with the bsi (brainstem implant) in the case of hearing nerve failure. 1998-01-27 2023-08-12 Not clear
A F Snik, A M Vermeulen, J P Brokx, C Beijk, P van den Broe. Speech perception performance of children with a cochlear implant compared to that of children with conventional hearing aids. I. The "equivalent hearing loss" concept. Acta oto-laryngologica. vol 117. issue 5. 1997-12-16. PMID:9349875. this matching procedure results in the expression of the speech perception scores of a child with a ci as an "equivalent hearing loss" value. 1997-12-16 2023-08-12 Not clear
A F Snik, A M Vermeulen, J P Brokx, C Beijk, P van den Broe. Speech perception performance of children with a cochlear implant compared to that of children with conventional hearing aids. I. The "equivalent hearing loss" concept. Acta oto-laryngologica. vol 117. issue 5. 1997-12-16. PMID:9349875. to illustrate this, application of the procedure to three children with a ci showed that before implantation, while they were using conventional hearing aids, the equivalent hearing loss was above 120 db hearing level (hl). 1997-12-16 2023-08-12 Not clear
A F Snik, A M Vermeulen, C P Geelen, J P Brokx, P van den Broe. Speech perception performance of children with a cochlear implant compared to that of children with conventional hearing aids. II. Results of prelingually deaf children. Acta oto-laryngologica. vol 117. issue 5. 1997-12-16. PMID:9349876. in a previous paper, a method was introduced to transform the results obtained by children with a cochlear implant (ci) on a battery of speech perception tests into an overall value, the "equivalent hearing loss" value. 1997-12-16 2023-08-12 Not clear
A F Snik, A M Vermeulen, C P Geelen, J P Brokx, P van den Broe. Speech perception performance of children with a cochlear implant compared to that of children with conventional hearing aids. II. Results of prelingually deaf children. Acta oto-laryngologica. vol 117. issue 5. 1997-12-16. PMID:9349876. the equivalent hearing loss values of 16 prelingually deaf children with a ci were plotted as a function of time. 1997-12-16 2023-08-12 Not clear
T C Morata, T Engel, A Durão, T R Costa, E F Krieg, D E Dunn, M A Lozan. Hearing loss from combined exposures among petroleum refinery workers. Scandinavian audiology. vol 26. issue 3. 1997-12-15. PMID:9309809. the adjusted odds ratio estimates for hearing loss were 2.4 times greater for groups from aromatics and paraffins (95% ci 1.0-5.7), 3 times greater for the maintenance group (95% ci 1.3-6.9) and 1.8 times greater for the group from shipping (95% ci 0.6-4.9), when compared to unexposed workers from the warehouse and health clinic. 1997-12-15 2023-08-12 Not clear
R T Miyamoto, K I Kirk, A M Robbins, S Todd, A Rile. Speech perception and speech production skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Acta oto-laryngologica. vol 116. issue 2. 1996-11-07. PMID:8725523. in this study, the performance of ci users was examined longitudinally on a battery of speech perception measures and compared with subjects with profound hearing loss who used conventional hearing aids (ha). 1996-11-07 2023-08-12 human
L McKenn. The psychological assessment of cochlear implant patients. British journal of audiology. vol 20. issue 1. 1986-05-05. PMID:3754165. the use of a cochlear implant (ci) to restore some acoustical input to patients with complete acquired hearing loss may be expected to result in changes in their psychological functioning. 1986-05-05 2023-08-11 Not clear